NOVEMBER 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022
The Influence of Project-based Learning to Empower Students’ Cognitive Abilities
1Yarno,2Mustaji,3Bachtiar S. Bachri,4Fajar Arianto
1,2,3,4Teknologi Pendidikian, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-49

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research aimed to describe the influence of project-based learning (PjBL) on the cognitive abilities of students. The research method used an experimental design. The samples were classified into two studies and collected in a non-randomized manner. The subjects were the students of the first semester in FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya who was programming Indonesian course. The research data was collected by using tests to test cognitive abilities or learning outcomes. The data was then analyzed descriptively, especially against the mean and its standard deviation. Before the statistical test, a check was carried out on the normality and uniformity of the data. The next step is the analysis of MANOVA. Based on the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that the value of F calculating cognitive ability was 21,836 with a significance level of 0.000. There was a significant influence of the project-based learning model on cognitive abilities between the experimental group and the control group. Therefore, Ho was rejected because there was an influence on students’ cognitive abilities or learning outcomes. Thus, the hypothesis of this research was proven. The results showed that there was an influence of project-based learning models on cognitive abilities, in this case student learning outcomes

KEYWORDS: Project-based Learning, cognitive ability, critical thinking, high school, collaborative

REFERENCES 1) Alloway, T. P., & Elsworth, M. (2012). An investigation of cognitive skills and behavior in high ability students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 891–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.02.001

2) Araujo, M. C., Carneiro, P., Cruz-Aguayo, Y., & Schady, N. (2016). Teacher Quality and Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten. The Quarterly Journal of Economics Advance, 202, 1–39. file:///Users/ManojAtolia/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Ludema, Mayda, F - 2013 - an us cr ip t Ac ce pt.pdf

3) Basilotta Gómez-Pablos, V., Martín del Pozo, M., & García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, A. (2017). Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.056

4) Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d

5) Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010

6) Chaijum, N., & Hiranyachattada, T. (2020). Integrated learning and project-based learning for project of electrical measurement and instrumentations in electrical engineering course. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9543

7) Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

8) Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

9) Chiong, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative learning in online study groups: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education:Research, 11(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.28945/1574

10) Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library and Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.017

11) Edrizal, Fardi, A., & Emral. (2018). Hubungan Antara VO2max Dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Sport Science, 18(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.24036/jss.v18i1.13

12) Gavin, K. (2011). Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.624173

13) Grønlien, H. K., Christoffersen, T. E., Ringstad, Ø., Andreassen, M., & Lugo, R. G. (2021). A blended learning teaching strategy strengthens the nursing students’ performance and self-reported learning outcome achievement in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course – A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 52(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103046

14) Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana, D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu Group.

15) Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1

16) Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research, Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

17) Kazemi, F., Yektayar, M., & Abad, A. M. B. (2012). Investigation the impact of chess play on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32(Iccs 2011), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.056

18) Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 97, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002

19) Kettanun, C. (2015). Project-based Learning and Its Validity in a Thai EFL Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.094

20) Koes-H, S., & Putri, N. D. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning in STEM on Students’ Scientific Reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006

21) Kok, M., Kal, E., van Doodewaard, C., Savelsbergh, G., & van der Kamp, J. (2021). Tailoring explicit and implicit instruction methods to the verbal working memory capacity of students with special needs can benefit motor learning outcomes in physical education. Learning and Individual Differences, 89(June), 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102019

22) Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006

23) Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092

24) Laal, M., Laal, M., & Kermanshahi, Z. K. (2012). 21st Century Learning; Learning in Collaboration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1696–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.885

25) Lavrijsen, J., Preckel, F., Verachtert, P., Vansteenkiste, M., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Are motivational benefits of adequately challenging schoolwork related to students’ need for cognition, cognitive ability, or both? Personality and Individual Differences, 171(October 2020), 110558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110558

26) Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Student characteristics affecting the recognition of high cognitive ability by teachers and peers. Learning and Individual Differences, 78(June 2019), 101820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101820

27) Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2020). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & Education, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063

28) Liu, X., Shi, Y., Niu, B., Shi, Z., Li, J., Ma, Z., Wang, J., Gong, P., Zheng, A., Zhang, F., Gao, X., & Zhang, K. (2016). Polymorphic variation in CHAT gene modulates general cognitive ability: An association study with random student cohort. Neuroscience Letters, 617, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.002

29) Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking: Testing the Link. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291257

30) Mahajan, H., Naik, S. M., Sreeramulu, M., Kannaiah, C., & Majeedullah, S. (2021). Impact of project-based learning for improving students skills by incorporating design thinking process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(Special Issue), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157150

31) Mulyadi, M., Tonapa, S. I., Rompas, S. S. J., Wang, R. H., & Lee, B. O. (2021). Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students’ learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Nurse Education Today, 107(September), 105127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105127

32) Murnane, R. J., Ganimian, A. J., Trongé, M. Á., Barrera-osorio, F., Beuermann, D., Bruns, B., Deming, D., Fiszbein, A., Guaqueta, J., Hill, H., Lisman, M., Llach, J., Narodowski, M., Ñopo, H., Oliveira, J. B., Puryear, J., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Improving Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries : NBER Working Paper Series.

33) Nasution, E. Y. P., & Lubis, F. H. (2019). Meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw berbasis algebrator. Pythagoras, 8(2), 82–92.

34) Ogawa, K., Kawamura, T., & Matsushita, K. (2020). Effects of cognitive ability and age on giving in dictator game experiments. Research in Economics, 74(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2020.10.002

35) Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers and Education, 95, 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007

36) Priyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publishing.

37) Ríos, I. D. L., Cazorla, A., Díaz-Puente, J. M., & Yagüe, J. L. (2010). Project-based learning in engineering higher education: Two decades of teaching competences in real environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.202

38) Romero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: Value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning and Control, 22(5–6), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.536619

39) Saptono, L., Soetjipto, B. E., Wahjoedi, & Wahyono, H. (2020). Role-playing model: Is it effective to improve students’ accounting learning motivation and learning achievements? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.24781

40) Sart, G. (2014). The Effects of the Development of Metacognition on Project-based Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.169

41) Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Karanganyar: Literasi Media Publishing.

42) Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005

43) Stolte, M., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2019). Inhibition, friend or foe? Cognitive inhibition as a moderator between mathematical ability and mathematical creativity in primary school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 142(June), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.024

44) Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

45) Suherman, Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., Laksono, P., & Amiruddin. (2020). Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) with Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model Assisted by Geogebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027

46) Supratiknya, A. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif dalam Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

47) Susanti, R. (2014). Pembelajaran model examples non examples berbantuan powerpoint untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i2.3110

48) Tascı, B. G. (2015). Project Based Learning from Elementary School to College, Tool: Architecture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 770–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.130

49) Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., & Van der Ven, S. H. G. (2021). Why and for whom does personalizing math problems enhance performance? Testing the mediation of enjoyment and cognitive load at different ability levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 87, 101982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101982

50) Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: a new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881386

51) Yunita, Y., Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Suhendra, S. (2021). The effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) model in students’ mathematical ability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012080

52) Zhao, D., McCoy, A. P., Bulbul, T., Fiori, C., & Nikkhoo, P. (2015). Building Collaborative Construction Skills through BIM-integrated Learning Environment. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.986251

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar